Review



rotarod apparatus  (Med Associates Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Med Associates Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Med Associates Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 96
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Med Associates Inc rotarod apparatus
    Rotarod Apparatus, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 987 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rotarod apparatus/product/Med Associates Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 987 article reviews
    rotarod apparatus - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    accelerating 286 rotarod apparatus  (Omnitech Electronics)
    93
    Omnitech Electronics accelerating 286 rotarod apparatus
    Accelerating 286 Rotarod Apparatus, supplied by Omnitech Electronics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/accelerating 286 rotarod apparatus/product/Omnitech Electronics
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    accelerating 286 rotarod apparatus - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    rotarod apparatus  (Med Associates Inc)
    96
    Med Associates Inc rotarod apparatus
    Rotarod Apparatus, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rotarod apparatus/product/Med Associates Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rotarod apparatus - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    rotarod apparatus  (Omnitech Electronics)
    93
    Omnitech Electronics rotarod apparatus
    Motor behavioral assessment and its correlation with rsFC of different brain networks post-soman exposure. a A <t>Rotarod</t> <t>(RR)</t> <t>apparatus</t> was used to test the motor behavior of rats at 6 weeks post-soman. The time to fall for each animal is plotted as mean ± SEM in ( b ) and as difference in mean compared to control in ( c ), depicted as a horizontal line. * indicates the soman effect (soman vs control) and # represents treatment effect (vs soman + vehicle). d , e A correlation matrix depicting a correlation coefficient (Pearson correlation, p < 0.05) between time to fall (seconds) in RR (6 weeks post soman) and rsFC of different regional networks (8–9 weeks post soman) is presented, with ‘X’ marks p -value ≥ 0.05 (not significant). f – i Simple linear regression comparing between the time to fall (seconds) and the rsFC (active voxels) with the corresponding correlation coefficient (r) and p -value. Each dot on the graphs represents a data point from each animal. n = 15–30 (7–16/sex), * indicates soman effect (vs control) and # represents effect (vs Soman + vehicle) with corresponding p -values
    Rotarod Apparatus, supplied by Omnitech Electronics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rotarod apparatus/product/Omnitech Electronics
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rotarod apparatus - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    rota rod rotamex 5  (Columbus Instruments)
    96
    Columbus Instruments rota rod rotamex 5
    Motor behavioral assessment and its correlation with rsFC of different brain networks post-soman exposure. a A <t>Rotarod</t> <t>(RR)</t> <t>apparatus</t> was used to test the motor behavior of rats at 6 weeks post-soman. The time to fall for each animal is plotted as mean ± SEM in ( b ) and as difference in mean compared to control in ( c ), depicted as a horizontal line. * indicates the soman effect (soman vs control) and # represents treatment effect (vs soman + vehicle). d , e A correlation matrix depicting a correlation coefficient (Pearson correlation, p < 0.05) between time to fall (seconds) in RR (6 weeks post soman) and rsFC of different regional networks (8–9 weeks post soman) is presented, with ‘X’ marks p -value ≥ 0.05 (not significant). f – i Simple linear regression comparing between the time to fall (seconds) and the rsFC (active voxels) with the corresponding correlation coefficient (r) and p -value. Each dot on the graphs represents a data point from each animal. n = 15–30 (7–16/sex), * indicates soman effect (vs control) and # represents effect (vs Soman + vehicle) with corresponding p -values
    Rota Rod Rotamex 5, supplied by Columbus Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rota rod rotamex 5/product/Columbus Instruments
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rota rod rotamex 5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    rotarod apparatus  (Columbus Instruments)
    96
    Columbus Instruments rotarod apparatus
    Motor behavioral assessment and its correlation with rsFC of different brain networks post-soman exposure. a A <t>Rotarod</t> <t>(RR)</t> <t>apparatus</t> was used to test the motor behavior of rats at 6 weeks post-soman. The time to fall for each animal is plotted as mean ± SEM in ( b ) and as difference in mean compared to control in ( c ), depicted as a horizontal line. * indicates the soman effect (soman vs control) and # represents treatment effect (vs soman + vehicle). d , e A correlation matrix depicting a correlation coefficient (Pearson correlation, p < 0.05) between time to fall (seconds) in RR (6 weeks post soman) and rsFC of different regional networks (8–9 weeks post soman) is presented, with ‘X’ marks p -value ≥ 0.05 (not significant). f – i Simple linear regression comparing between the time to fall (seconds) and the rsFC (active voxels) with the corresponding correlation coefficient (r) and p -value. Each dot on the graphs represents a data point from each animal. n = 15–30 (7–16/sex), * indicates soman effect (vs control) and # represents effect (vs Soman + vehicle) with corresponding p -values
    Rotarod Apparatus, supplied by Columbus Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rotarod apparatus/product/Columbus Instruments
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rotarod apparatus - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Motor behavioral assessment and its correlation with rsFC of different brain networks post-soman exposure. a A Rotarod (RR) apparatus was used to test the motor behavior of rats at 6 weeks post-soman. The time to fall for each animal is plotted as mean ± SEM in ( b ) and as difference in mean compared to control in ( c ), depicted as a horizontal line. * indicates the soman effect (soman vs control) and # represents treatment effect (vs soman + vehicle). d , e A correlation matrix depicting a correlation coefficient (Pearson correlation, p < 0.05) between time to fall (seconds) in RR (6 weeks post soman) and rsFC of different regional networks (8–9 weeks post soman) is presented, with ‘X’ marks p -value ≥ 0.05 (not significant). f – i Simple linear regression comparing between the time to fall (seconds) and the rsFC (active voxels) with the corresponding correlation coefficient (r) and p -value. Each dot on the graphs represents a data point from each animal. n = 15–30 (7–16/sex), * indicates soman effect (vs control) and # represents effect (vs Soman + vehicle) with corresponding p -values

    Journal: Acta Neuropathologica Communications

    Article Title: Dual targeting of iNOS and Src tyrosine kinase as a superior therapeutic strategy against soman-induced long-term neurotoxicity: multimodal biomarker, imaging, and neurobehavioral outcome analyses

    doi: 10.1186/s40478-025-02220-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Motor behavioral assessment and its correlation with rsFC of different brain networks post-soman exposure. a A Rotarod (RR) apparatus was used to test the motor behavior of rats at 6 weeks post-soman. The time to fall for each animal is plotted as mean ± SEM in ( b ) and as difference in mean compared to control in ( c ), depicted as a horizontal line. * indicates the soman effect (soman vs control) and # represents treatment effect (vs soman + vehicle). d , e A correlation matrix depicting a correlation coefficient (Pearson correlation, p < 0.05) between time to fall (seconds) in RR (6 weeks post soman) and rsFC of different regional networks (8–9 weeks post soman) is presented, with ‘X’ marks p -value ≥ 0.05 (not significant). f – i Simple linear regression comparing between the time to fall (seconds) and the rsFC (active voxels) with the corresponding correlation coefficient (r) and p -value. Each dot on the graphs represents a data point from each animal. n = 15–30 (7–16/sex), * indicates soman effect (vs control) and # represents effect (vs Soman + vehicle) with corresponding p -values

    Article Snippet: Motor learning and coordination in rodents were assessed using an accelerating rotarod apparatus (AccuRotor 4-channel, Omnitech Electronics Inc., and Start Fusion v6.2 AccuRotor Edition Software) as previously described [ ].

    Techniques: Control